Dec 31 2008

The Grapes Of Wrath

After reading this book I can now say that I finally get this song.  I really don’t know why it took me so long to get around and read this book.  Unfortunately, I think I let some idiot’s opinion–dry, long, boring–influence me waaay back in high school.  The sad thing is that if I would have read this in high school I would have enjoyed it, but I don’t think I would have appreciated it as much as I do now.

So what’s the book about, you’re saying, what are these grapes and why are they so wrathful.  First, however, I’d like to say that I think that this book and Oil! should be companion pieces as they are two sides of the same coin.  One dealing with the greed and corruption of corporations and the other deal with the consequences, for the normal have-nots, of said greed and corruption.  What make it even more compelling is that even though it is a work of fiction it is describing real events and could easily be used in a history class to give events a more personal feeling without losing sense of the scope of what was happening during this period.

Steinbeck accomplishes this duality by splitting up the book into alternating chapters that shift from a macro to a micro perspective.  One part deals with the nameless, faceless everyman who is moving west in an attempt to scratch out an existence.  These chapters are short (5-6 pages) and they serve a couple purpose.  One is to remind the reader that there are literally hundreds of thousands of people in the same situation as the Joads.  It also serves to help progress the story as he uses these chapters to introduce the next stage in their journey and heighten the conflict in the story.  These chapters although short are masterfully done, and are some of the best chapters in the entire book.  It’s in these chapters where Steinbeck’s descriptive prose is nothing short of amazing.  There are a lot of great writers and a lot of great books, but then there are those–books and authors–that are just on a higher echelon than the others.  This is one of those books and is easily the best Steinbeck novel I’ve read.  Steinbeck really knows how to transport you into the story.  His descriptions of the land is so earthy and real that it gets into your pores, you can almost feel the dust and the dirt on you.  In his descriptions of these nameless people you can see the worry in their eyes and feel the pain and desperation in their hearts.  It is in these chapters where I realized just how good Steinbeck is.

Continue reading


Dec 14 2008

Winter Reading

Today I went to Barnes & Noble to buy some books to read over the break.  Fortunately I received a gift card from the history department for my exemplary work this semester, so I was able to buy more books than I was planning on.  So here is what I am going to be attempt to read over the break:

The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck

A Farewell to Arms by Ernest Hemingway

Oil! by Upton Sinclair

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln by Doris Kearns Goodwin

I almost got Dostoevsky’s House of the Dead, but instead decided on Oil!.  If I somehow manage to finish all of these I will probably pick it up or I may re-read Don Quixote.  Anyways look out for reviews for these books as I finish them, and feel free to recommend other books that you think I may like (not Twilight though).  Now I just have to figure out which book I am going to start with.


Dec 12 2008

Winter Break To-Do List

I am finally done with this semester and not a moment too soon.  I barely made it, but luckily I only have one more left, which is going to make this break even more hectic. So here is my list of things that I need/want to accomplish before the break is over:

First things first I have to start looking for a job so that hopefully I can slide right into something once I graduate.  Unfortunately, that means that I have to fix my resume, write a cover letter, and all that trash.  All the stuff that I hate doing.  Preferably I would like to stay in New York so hopefully I find something good, despite the state of the economy.  So if anyone out there has the scoop on a job in history, libraries, or publishing let me know.

I also have to start looking for a new apartment, hopefully something closer to the city, because my roommates and I all graduate at the same time and we are all moving.  Hopefully I will be able to find something closer to the city and at a price where I don’t need a roommate.  I’m tired of living with roommates.

Next I want to read a few books over the holiday season.  I’m not sure what to read though.  I have a few books lying around that I haven’t read yet: Paradiso, Purgatorio, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, or Paradise Lost.  However, I would like to maybe read some more Hemingway, Steinbeck, Dostoyevsky, or Fitzgerald.  I’m thinking that maybe I should try and expand my horizons some so I am looking for some tips on new books to read.  The Liskid has already suggested Upton Sinclair’s Oil!, Balzac’s Pere Goriot, and Proust.  With that being said, my loyal readers, check out my goodreads page or some of my book reviews to see what type of books I have already read and am into, and then send me your suggestions that are either similar to what I like or might help me expand my horizons.

So there in long form is my to-do list for the break.  I have until Jan. 21 so any book, job, or apartment suggestions will be most appreciated.


Nov 15 2008

Pet Peeves, III

I was planning on writing this edition–previous editions here–of pet peeves on umbrellas and the people that use them.  They have really been pissing me off lately, but you will have to wait until the next edition for that one.  Today I frequented my local library to pick up some extra books for my research paper, and my ire over umbrellas has been superseded by my fury at the assholes who deface library books.

What?  Am I serious?  Yes I am.  Maybe it is because I am a nerd who likes to read, research, write, and all those things, or maybe it is because I respect public property.  You see library books belong to us all.  They are free of charge, and allow anyone to access knowledge to better themselves.  That’s the great thing about libraries.  The knowledge that resides inside them is accessible to anyone no matter what your educational or social standing may be.  The problem is that that only works if people respect the books, and treat them accordingly.  I can’t tell you how much this pisses me off, and it’s more than just writing juvenile words, like dick, or drawing inappropriate pictures, like dicks, inside books, and then laughing to your friends about how cool you are (seriously what is it with dicks that people feel compelled to write it or draw them everywhere).  Beyond being an idiot and writing or drawing those things in books there is another aspect of defacement.  Let me show you what I mean.  Here is a book I had to check out today on Alexander Hamilton, and American Foreign Policy.


These are three separate random pages pulled from a book that is covered front-to-back with similarly marked pages.  So what’s wrong with this?  Obviously the person thought that the information in the book was important and they marked it accordingly, right?  No and No.  It’s completely wrong, and now I’m going to give you all a short succinct primer on how books should be marked.  There is a standard decorum that should be followed by everyone who uses library books, and especially rare books and documents.

First off do not use pen–or any permanent marking instrument–when you are marking books, ever.  Now if you own the book I guess it’s ok, but even then I’d advise against it.  In case you forgot pens are permanent, and as such, permanently stain the books.  If you are going to make marks in a book use a pencil, and make light marks so that they can be erased.  This becomes even more important when marking in rare books and documents.  Let me repeat that again: DO NOT USE PENS. Pens are evil, and should never be used.  This rule applies to any marking tool that is permanent including highlighters.  Please stop using highlighters in books–especially the pink and blue ones.

Secondly, this douche-bag has decided to use a wide array of marks to connote the usefulness of a passage.  Let’s see, we have circles, ovals, underlines, strikethroughs, random rune looking characters, arcs, and probably even more that I missed.  This is all completely unnecessary.  I’m assuming that most, if not all, of the information in this book is important.  What you want to do is connote which information is applicable to your particular topic or argument.  To do this you do not need to make all kinds of crazy marks in the book.  It doesn’t make you look any smarter if you have all this crap all over the pages.  In fact, it makes it harder for anyone else to use the book after you making you look like a simpleton.  So what do you do then.  Well using a pencil you want to either lightly make small brackets around useful passages or lightly underline a specific sentence or phrase.  If it’s an important passage don’t underline the whole thing, even if you are using a pencil, that’s where the brackets come in.  That’s it.  It’s even acceptable to jot down a quick note in the margin, once again, in pencil.  That’s all you need to do. If you find that you can’t do your research or reading without all the crazy, extravagant marks, then grab a note book.  Then you can use a notebook while you are reading to write down page numbers, and anything else you need to write down to help you assimilate the information.

Lastly, these books are not work books, and deserve better than to be marked up like this.  I particularly don’t get the strikethroughs or crossing out entire words or sentences–something that I have seen way too much of lately.  If a sentence isn’t helpful or pertinent to you then don’t blight it from existence, because someone else might find it useful.  There is absolutely no need to ever scribble out words, phrases, and paragraphs.  Just don’t do it.  If you feel that you can’t abide by these rules, then don’t use the library, and go buy all your books, but don’t ruin it for those of us who need these books.

To sum up all the rules:

Do not under any circumstances use pens, highlighters, markers, or any other permanent marking instrument.

Do not extravagantly mark up the books.  Less is more.

Do not blight out words, phrases, and paragraphs.

Use pencils only, and mark lightly. Let me repeat that again, just in case you are slow,

USE PENCILS ONLY AND MARK LIGHTLY.

There you go, now you know all you need to know to correctly mark in books.

Thus endeth the lesson.


Aug 11 2008

Generation Kill

After watching this superb mini-series on HBO I decided to pick up Generation Kill.  I took it with me to Houston, and I was able to pretty much read the whole book in the airport because of all the delays that came from Tropical Storm Eduardo.  As good as the mini-series is the book, for me, is even better.  Evan Wright goes step-by-step in his journey with First Recon, and events that get cut short in the show are more fully explained in the book.  The greatest strength of the book is the fact that Wright doesn’t try to turn the book into some treatise into why the war is bad, or good, or any other crap like that that usually gets in the way.  Instead he makes it unpolitical, and just tries to relay to the reader what life is like for the these Marines in a war zone.  He doesn’t hold back with the language or in any of the events that happen throughout the march to Baghdad.  I really found it to be a fair and impartial account of life in the Marines during the invasion.  This book is an incredibly smooth and easy read, and as long as you can handle reading a book with often times filthy language you should be able to cruise through it no problem.

One of the best parts of this book was that my old battalion got a little shout out, and I found out something that I have been wondering about for a long time.  This chapter was cut down a bit in the show, but in the book it goes more in depth.  The set-up is that a Marine is killed, and his body is taken into the town of Ash Shatrah and mutilated by the populace.  My company was called in, along with others, to look for his body.  The CIA was also called in, because supposedly Ali Hassan al-Majid or “Chemical Ali” was hiding out in the town.  Probably one of the most bittersweet moments of my life leading a patrol to find this Marine and getting complimented by the CIA, but yet not being able to find the Marine.  We didn’t not find him for lack of looking though.  We tore up the hospitals and other locations, and ended up finding intel on other terrorists, but not the missing Marine.  We were told by some of the elders that his body was taken out to the desert, and given a Christian burial.  However, we all knew this was bullshit.  Unfortunately we didn’t get Chemical Ali either, and after looking for him, and looking for the lost Marine again we had to leave for another mission.  I have often thought about the guy since then.  Who was he? was he ever found? does his family know how hard we looked for him?  Things like that, and then I read:

The body of this Marine is discovered a week later by other American forces.  They find him buried in Ash Shatrah’s trash dump.

Over six years later I finally find out what happened to the missing Marine.  That alone makes the book worth the read for me.  It feels good knowing that he was found, and that his body was brought back to the US to his family.  It’s just too bad that it took six years for me to find this out.

Continue reading


Aug 9 2008

Big Brother is Writing You

War is Peace.

Freedom is Slavery.

Via The Daily Dish, Orwell is now a blogger:

The Orwell Prize, Britain’s pre-eminent prize for political writing, is publishing George Orwell’s diaries as a blog. From 9th August 2008, Orwell’s domestic and political diaries (from 9th August 1938 until October 1942) will be posted in real-time, exactly 70 years after the entries were written.

1984 is the standard bearer for dystopian novels, and is one of my favorite books.  I never fail to learn something new upon subsequent readings, and no matter what, it continues to scare me with its vision and scope.  So I am going to be reading this blog regularly, and I’m sure that Orwell’s political writings will be particularly insightful.  So head on over to the Orwell Diaries, check out the first post, and check back often for what I’m sure will be all kinds of awesome.


Jul 22 2008

Treasure Island

Treasure Island is Robert Louis Stevenson’s iconic pirate adventure story.  Although Stevenson didn’t create the whole pirate genre he helped define it.  Treasure Island became the standard bearer in the adventure story genre becoming a best-seller, and staying a best-seller for over a hundred years.  The story is fairly straight forward.  There is a treasure map, where X marks the spot, and rivaling factions of buccaneers are battling for the map.  What makes this work is Stevenson brings plenty of realism to the characters and the story through his writing, and by filling the story all kinds of real world knowledge of pirates and sailing.  Unlike Herman Melville’s Moby Dick, however, Stevenson doesn’t allow these facts to hijack and become his story, otherwise we would have had a story filled mostly with pirates sailing around the ocean being piratey but never actually doing anything.

Instead Stevenson puts just enough of these facts and nautical jargon in to help immerse the reader into the story even further.  Otherwise Stevenson omits all the superfluous details.  For example there are long sea voyages in this book, but instead of telling the reader about tacking jib sails, or of the doldrums, or any other boring stuff, he just skips it and has the narrator fill in any important details.  What this does is it allows the action to stay center stage, and it keeps the novel moving at a furious pace.  Each chapter is like its own self-contained story, and every chapter is like an episode of a TV show.  It really reminded me of those old Saturday morning serials that were on TV back in the day.  This set-up keeps the reading moving along at a fast and easy pace.  This is one of the most readable books I have read in a long time, and plus it’s a lot of fun to read.  I had a ton of time to read this weekend, with all the trains and buses I had to take, but the time flew by while I was reading.  Then again how can you not enjoy reading about pirates and treasure?  This is a highly influential book, and in reading it I can see how many archetypes came from this book.  Like I said before much of the pirate lore and mythology was codified by this book

Jim Hawkins – is the narrator and hero of the story.  He is the one that initiates the adventure by getting his hands on the treasure map.  His ensuing story is not only one that appeals to young boys, but to anyone who has ever had dreams of sailing the open seas looking for adventure.  Jim Hawkins can be added to the short list of child narrators in literature that work.  For me the only other one that worked was Huck Finn.

Continue reading


Jul 18 2008

The Master and Margarita

The Master and Margarita, by Mikhail Bulgakov, is a hilarious, but deep book.  Although I have never read Faust this book is influenced by it.   The Master and Margarita deals with what happens in Moscow when the devil comes to town for a visit.  The devil comes with his gang of miscreants that include a humongous talking black cat, a pirate, a naked witch, and Korovyov the choir master.  They descend upon Moscow wreaking havoc wherever they go.  However, since Muscovites don’t believe in God or Satan, they have to find some way to explain all of the strange occurrences that are befalling the city.  This was a great book to read after The Brothers Karamazov, because one of the themes that Dostoevsky explores in it is the struggle between science and religion.  In Dostoevsky’s work, one of the prevalent fears throughout is the loss of faith of the Russian people–especially in The Demons.  He sees that nihilism is becoming too prevalent among the Russian people, and Dostoevsky worries about what may happen if this trend continues.  Bulgakov’s book is written in the 1930′s when the ideals of communism are in full force, and many of Dostoevsky’s fears have been realized.  Despite seeing the unbelievable and the supernatural the citizens of Moscow refuse to believe, and they actively try to dispel any notions that Satan is real.  The devil and his retinue are hilarious, and yet, very scary.  This is a devil that seems real.  He is intelligent, conniving, and ruthless; although his gang is even more ruthless, and at times have to be restrained by the devil, but not often.  These characters absolutely love creating chaos and mayhem, and although it can be a bit unnerving it is nevertheless an extremely enjoyable read.

The Master, however, is one of the few who dares to not only believe, but to write a story about Pontius Pilate.  His story of Pontius Pilate and Jesus is like nothing you have ever read before, and is highly entertaining.  It is this story that gets him into trouble, and eventually garners the attention of the devil.

Margarita, is the women who loves the Master.  She loves him so much, in fact, that she is willing to do anything for him.  She goes through her own heroes journey in the book, and proves that she is willing to move heaven and hell for the love of her life.

Bulgakov masterly interweaves history with fantasy throughout the novel.  The book at the same time is a scathing review on Soviet life under Stalin.  It was censored in by the Soviet Union, and was not published uncensored until late in the 20th Century.  Like I mentioned above what is this book really comes down to is a realization of the fears that Dostoevsky perceived to be coming more than fifty years before this novel was published.  Unlike other Russian novels, which are extraordinarily verbose and lengthy, The Master and Margarita clocks in at 335 pages.  So if the long novels are too daunting for you than this is a much shorter novel, and more readable than Dostoevsky.  It was an enjoyable read, and a very good book, but for me it still not as good as either The Brothers Karamazov, Crime and Punishment, or The Idiot.  But then I am also a bit of a masochist and I really enjoy long, long well written novels.  And now for the excerpt.  During this scene the devil and his evil gang make their official entrance onto the Moscow scene in the form of a magic show at the Variety Theater.

Continue reading


Jul 8 2008

The Brothers Karamazov

I should begin by stating that I absolutely love Dostoevsky, and Russian Literature.  This is the fourth major novel of his that I have read.  The other three are Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, and The Demons (also alternately titled The Possessed ).  This novel I would rank after Crime and Punishment and probably just in front of The Idiot.  Although The Demons is a good book is lags well behind the others.  Reading Dostoevsky is daunting.  Every time I start on page 1, and realize that I have 700+ pages left, I feel that I will never finish.  His books are long, methodical, and incredibly verbose.  For many people this is unacceptable, and they can’t stand reading books that long.  I, however, really enjoy long, well written books.  In this day and age of instant gratification, even in modern novels, it is nice to read a book that takes its time.  Like his other books, this one starts out slowly plodding along like an old horse.   It is his prose and his ability to write consistent, believable characters that makes his books so enjoyable.  He is a true master, and I learn something new about writing every time I read his work.

The Brothers Karamazov, in my opinion, is a much more lofty and mature work.  It is rightly considered his greatest work, because it is his most ambitious.  It seems as if he took everything he learned from his previous novels–including the grand themes from each–and combined them into one glorious masterpiece.  Dostoevsky’s greatest strength is how he writes his characters.  He is able to take the reader into the mind of these fabulous–and many times dark–characters.  In Crime and Punishment the whole novel is about the inner workings of the mind of a murderer before, during, and after his murder, and subsequently into his path to redemption.  Dostoevsky was able to expand on that, and other themes that he had explored in previous books.  He brings in his ideas of God, science, nihilism, corruption, good and evil, and many others from The Idiot and The Demons.  Like in The Idiot, an epileptic character plays a major role in this novel.  The Brothers Karamazov is about so much more than parricide.  The book was published during 1879-80, and during this time science really started to conflict with religion.  Dostoevsky uses this book, in part, as a treatise on the fundamental questions of the relationship between religion and science.  Can they co-exist?  Does God exist or is he just a construct of man?

These are some of the questions that are raised in the book, and these questions help to drive the story.  One question posed is if God doesn’t exist, and is just the creation of man, then there is no sin.  Sin only exists if God exists, and therefore, if God doesn’t exist, then everything is legal, and nothing is prohibited.  Dostoevsky writes convincingly in favor of each stance, and shows a real knowledge about both topics.  (Dostoevsky, in fact, knows deeply about both topics.  He was sentenced to death for his radical socialistic views–a sentence which was rescinded.  He ended up spending four years in exile, in prison, in Siberia.  It was here where Dostoevsky renounced his radical and subversive views, and became deeply religious.  It was also here in Siberia that Dostoevsky’s was in the company of the worst sort of people: murderers, rapists, robbers, and other corrupted men.  It is through his close proximity to these people that allows him to write about these characters so convincingly.) These ideas of religion, science, and reason are characterized by the three sons of Fyodor Karamazov: Dmitri, Ivan, and Alexey (who is the hero of the novel).

Continue reading


Jun 25 2008

You have dirty toes!!

I’ve been meaning to read Catch-22, by Joseph Heller, for years, and I have finally gotten around to it.  I just finished it yesterday after reading it obsessively for the last few days.  It has to be one of the funniest books I have ever read.  I don’t even remember how many times someone stared at me because I was laughing uncontrollably on the subway, coffee shop, or walking down the street (yes this book was so good I often read it whilst walking down the street).  There were more laugh out loud moments than most comedies.  Besides being hilarious the book was also pretty deep.  The book, for those that don’t know, is about bomber pilots in World War II.  Invariably when you add war and death to a book it’s going to be deep; but Heller does it in a way that doesn’t get the reader depressed.  The book has everything from an anti-war message to hilarious stories about Italian whores.  If you are looking for a new book to read make it this one; and if you’re already reading a book make this one a priority to read next.  There are a literally tons of great scenes in this book; unfortunately I couldn’t find my favorite online–I’m way too lazy to type it–so instead I will post one of the best that I could find online enjoy.

Continue reading